Apple has long been praised for its innovation and design. But it’s also been criticised for what some call a ‘monopolistic’ approach.
What People see of Apple
On one side, you’ve got Apple, a tech titan and a pioneer company, who’s fortunes were made mainstream when they introduced the iPhone and then there’s the other side, you’ve got the other Apple, the bad company that just wants to keep users locked in.
I think that everyone, whichever side of the so called walled garden they sit at, has an opinion about this. Let’s break down the pros and cons and look at how these developments could shape the future of tech.
For me, on the plus side, Apple’s ecosystem offers a seamless user experience. If you’ve got an iPhone, an iPad, a Mac, in fact, any combination of Apple products, they all work together beautifully, devices sync with each other at an instant, and that’s what makes my workflow perfect.
It’s the same sort of integration and usability that I’d expect as a minimum if I were using similar ecosystems from Samsung or Google, and it’s this integration that is a big win for user convenience and brand loyalty. I like to think that Apple’s approach and their strategy has led to high-quality, innovative products that have consistently set industry standards.
There’s no way that executives at Google and Samsung aren’t envious of what Apple has done with their products that either retain existing users by continuously making new products that seamlessly just work and encourage them to buy more and not look at the competition, or entice new users by adding those features that users would only jump ship if they were included.
Apple were encouraged to put USB-C on the iPhone and they finally did to the relief of many with the iPhone 15 series. Now to play devil’s advocate, in this case we’re limiting choice, by universally adopting USB-C, how can innovation flourish if everyone is using USB-C?
When the next big USB type (D?) rolls out, is every electronics manufacturer going to by forced to comply.
Critics will always say that Apple’s closed ecosystem locks in consumers and stifles competition, which means less freedom for consumers, potentially making it difficult for consumers to switch to other brands.
Change might be difficult for some, but it’s not impossible.
I’d happily trade in my Apple Watch, for another watch from another brand (Currently looking at going back to Garmin Watches). I’m doing a lot of running at the moment and I’m very aware that while I can, use this Watch effectively as a fitness tracker, if I want to take it to the next level, then I should invest in a more dedicated Sportswatch, rather than the Apple Smartwatch.
Where the Problems Lie
While for some, the hardware trade off’s are much easier, it’s at software level, where you are the most confined.
Want to use a different app store or payment system? Not so easy with Apple. Critics say by controlling its app store and hardware, Apple limits competition, which can stifle innovation and lead to higher prices.
But Apple, in their defence will alway say, that their main goal is to protect users by making great products that enrich their users lives around the world, focusing on creating a high quality and safe experience through seamless integration of hardware, software and services.
The Digital Markets Act
This legislation aims to ensure fair competition, which encourages (forces) Apple to open up its services to third parties and effectively play nice with others. It’s a big deal because it might lower prices and increase choices for consumers.
With the introduction of this Act, it arguably brings several privacy and security concerns to the forefront:
- Data Protection and Privacy Risks: The Act’s focus on opening up platform ecosystems could lead to increased data sharing and interoperability between services, which should immediately raises concerns about how your personal data is managed and protected, especially in light of existing regulations like the GDPR.
- Allowing third-party apps and app stores more access to operating systems could potentially introduce security vulnerabilities. This is because it may be more challenging to ensure that all third-party services meet the same security standards as those enforced by the original platform providers.
Experts have called for amendments to the DMA to better protect users’ rights, fearing that the act, as it stands, may undermine competition, data protection, privacy, and consumer protection.
While it seems like this Act, mainly targets Apple (because that’s what the news says), companies like Apple, have expressed concerns about the DMA, anticipating that the new regulations could introduce privacy and security risks by preventing large digital platforms from imposing certain constraints that currently help to maintain user privacy and security.
But these risks highlight the delicate balance between fostering competition and protecting users’ privacy and security.
The implementation of the DMA will require careful consideration to mitigate these risks while achieving the act’s goals:
- More Choices and Better Services. So Consumers like you and I, will have access to a wider range of services, which could lead to better quality and fairer prices
- Easier Switching Between Providers, which the Act and the complying companies products covered under the Act, are designed to make it easier for consumers to switch providers if they wish, promoting customer freedom
Creating Short-Term Inconvenience for some online services, is seen as a necessary step for Long-Term Gain to promote greater competition, which will ultimately benefit consumers by providing more choices and fostering innovation.
Apple’s Response to the DMA
In answer to the DMA regulations, Apple has announced various changes to comply:
- Introducing over 600 New APIs and App Analytics for developers.
- The introduction of USB-C to the iPhone.
- Alternative Payment Processing and app stores outside of the Apple App Store coming soon.
These changes are designed to open up the market and provide more choices for consumers, but they also introduce new privacy and security risks, which Apple is addressing with additional safeguards.
Which if you’re looking for some light reading, I’d recommend looking at how Apple are complying with the Digital Markets Act and their efforts to Protect User Security and Privacy in the EU despite these rules and regulations. It’s advice to developers about the future and some warnings about the fact that while Apple will try to mitigate the user privacy and security risks as much as they can, if users use third party app stores to download content or pay with alternative payment processes, there will be added risks, which means iPhones outside of the EU will be more secure than the iPhones within those EU that are complying with the Digital Markets Act.
The DMA aims to create a safer digital space where the rights of users are protected and to establish a level playing field that fosters innovation and competitiveness, benefiting all consumers in the long run. But does it? Will we be revisiting this in the future, discussing whether this was the turning point.
US DOJ Sues Apple
The US Department of Justice has accessed Apple of monopolistic practices and being a little too clingy with its consumers.
This like the Digital Markets Act could lead to significant changes in how Apple operates, potentially benefiting consumers and developers alike.
Could the outcome of this case be the end of Apple’s ‘my way or the highway’ attitude?
While the Digital Markets Act refers to what all consumer products should do to comply not targeting any individual companies, the US DOJ’s lawsuit, personally attacks Apple, arguing about what, in their opinion, Apple are doing, which they believe is being monopolistic by:
- Locking in iPhone Customers, by Restricting access to critical technology and services to maintain its monopoly.
- Undermining Innovation, by allegedly suppressing apps and services that could make users less reliant on the iPhone.
All in the name of a positive result, that could lead to significant changes in how Apple operates, potentially benefiting consumers and developers.
Future Ramifications for the Tech industry
While this is about Apple now, what about other companies? Will these legal challenges set precedents, prompting them to rethink their strategies to avoid similar scrutiny. Apple have already made changes to the products in line with regulations, but was that the start of a slippery slope?
We’ve seen with many products, Apple’s approach does has a ripple effect on the entire tech industry. We’ve talking about a lawsuit against one of the biggest companies in the World.
Why should technology all be the same? Why does it have to interconnect? Shouldn’t the competition be innovating more aggressively to create better products to compete?
Remember, Google and Samsung, would love to have an established ecosystem like Apple does, but if they do get too dominant within their base, will those same companies adapt their strategies to avoid similar regulatory scrutiny or will they pounce to capitalise on any openings created by changes in Apple’s policies.
What about the little guys, the up-and-comers? Are the DMA and DOJ paving the way for more innovation and competition. Are they actually opening the floodgates for creativity? Let me know in the comments.
Why should governments have a say in the way companies make their products and advance their technology? Why should these advancements that make one company different from another be shared? Aren’t we limiting our choices by making everything similar.
If you want a more structured operating system that focuses more on user privacy, security and less on customisation and choice, you can choose the iPhone, and if you want more customisation, more app stores and more choice, you choose Android, there’s your choice.
It can’t be argued that Apple’s approach, since day one, has led to significant advancements in technology, for not only Apple, but through the iOS v Android saga, we’ve seen some of the best phones ever made, like the latest Samsung S24 Ultra or the Google Pixel 8 Pro, all born out of competition and trying to capture our attention.
While the EU’s DMA and the US DOJ case are pushing for more openness, which could lead to a more competitive and diverse market, it also has to be considered that it might not.
So, what’s next for Apple and the tech world? Only time will tell, but one thing’s for sure — Apple is facing a crossroads and the tech landscape might change to become to much more interconnected version of the one we have now
If you want to see the video version of this article check out the below YouTube link: